1. I reviewed the rule of three for writing an EQ.
2.
a. What is the most important factor in healthy weight loss?
This EQ doesn't really provide a stance, meaning that the answer is either going to be a fact from any organization or website. This EQ won't build a strong foundation with it being as simple as it is now, which can be improved.
b. What is most important to securing a conviction in a criminal investigation?
The EQ is sort of confusing and is not that specific as it can be, the format of the EQ can be written in a different way so it can all make sense. Doesn't really encourage depth and rigor on the topic.
c. What is most important in creating a hairstyle that best satisfies a customer?
The format is not clear at all the wording does not really make sense. You can't really argue anything, the answer can even be a personal opinion, doesn't take a stance. Nor does it provide any kind of framework.
d. How can an Anesthesiologist best treat chronic pain?
This EQ has two of the criterias except for one which is, take a stance it won't let you argue a certain point that it might have. And the answer might just be a list or facts of a recitation, which doesn't create depth in any sort of way.
Current EQ: What skill is most important to success as an advertising manager?
Possible draft: How must an advertising manager be successful in the public relations market?
I personally like my first one better because it has helped me a lot with my research to try and provide the exact answer, which has been a challenge.
